Supplier Quality Operating System

The supplier quality record,
captured at the source.

SQOS captures containment, counts, and conformance straight from the systems you already run, so the record is proof, not reconstruction.

FOR SUPPLIER QUALITY ENGINEERS & THE LEADERS WHO ANSWER FOR THE NUMBERS

WMS WAREHOUSE MGMT MES MFG EXECUTION ERP ENTERPRISE RES. SQOS OPERATING SYSTEM CONTAINMENT IN-SCAR SCORECARDS CONTINUOUS CHARGEBACKS RECOVERY EVIDENCE PPAP / FAI
A look inside

From qualification to proof, on a single record.

The work moves through three stages — plan and qualify, detect and resolve, then prove it — and SQOS keeps all three on one record, captured from the systems you already run. Previews below, shown with representative data.

Plan & qualify

Qualify the part before it reaches the line.

APQP and NPI gates, the full PPAP element package, first-article inspection, and the plans that route every characteristic. Approvals live on the record, not in an inbox.

  • APQP / NPI
  • PPAP
  • First article (AS9102)
  • Inspection plan & routing
A PPAP submission in SQOS: an 18-element package at 15 of 18 elements complete, each one checked off, for a bracket under review.
PPAP — the 18-element package, tracked element by element.
Detect & resolve

Catch it, contain it, close it.

Nonconformances captured where they happen, escalated to SCAR with the 8D inside the ticket, deviations dispositioned through MRB. Aging is visible long before it turns into a past-due problem.

  • NCR register
  • SCAR / 8D
  • Supplier deviations
  • MRB / CAB
SCAR aging in SQOS: open corrective actions bucketed at 0-30, 31-60, and over 60 days, with a thirteen-week aging trend.
SCAR aging — corrective actions by age bucket, over 13 weeks.
Analytics

Prove it in the numbers.

First-pass yield, PPM, and cost of poor quality, computed from inspection lots and reconciled to containment. The open-versus-closed picture is one you can stand behind in a review.

  • First-pass yield
  • PPM
  • Cost of poor quality
  • Scorecards & QBR
Quality analytics in SQOS: open versus closed corrective actions tracked across thirteen weeks.
Open vs closed — the corrective-action backlog, tracked weekly.
Positioning

You can’t forecast a nonconformance.

Purchasing and supply planning run on forecasts. Supplier quality runs on what just went wrong, a nonconformance that can surface at any stage and has to be resolved fast, with the whole record already in hand. A portal collects information; it was never built to run that work.

DATA SITS
Supplier portal

A place to submit information.

  • Suppliers log in. Documents get uploaded. Forms get submitted.
  • Someone still chases updates by email and reconciles the truth by hand.
  • Containment lives in a separate spreadsheet. Counts are whatever was typed.
  • The scorecard is a monthly export that's stale the day it's sent.
SQOSDATA RUNS
Supplier Quality Operating System

A system that runs the operation.

  • Containment lives inside the SCAR, tied to the part, lot, and disposition.
  • Counts come straight from WMS and MES through the API.
  • Every event posts to scorecards and chargebacks as it happens.
  • The record stays current because the system keeps it current.
The number

Quality events are dollars. SQOS makes them recoverable.

When a containment, a chargeback, or a nonconformance is captured as a transaction instead of a conversation, the cost stops disappearing. Supply chain and quality leaders get one current view of liability, recovery, and supplier performance, the number they actually answer for.

0
system of record
0
quality workflows
0
source systems · WMS·MES·ERP
0
spreadsheets to chase
Plans

Three tiers. Priced to the program, not the page.

Starter gets a single site onto one system of record. Professional adds recovery, connectors, and the AI assistant. Enterprise adds advanced access controls, CAC/PIV, and isolation.

See plans →
Questions

The questions buyers actually ask.

How is this different from the supplier portal we already have?+
A portal is where suppliers submit information; SQOS runs the work on top of it. Containment lives inside the SCAR, counts come from your WMS and MES, and every event posts to scorecards and chargebacks on its own. The real difference is whether the record is captured at the source or reconstructed after the fact.
How deep does the integration actually go?+
Past reading a BOM to populate a field. SQOS pulls live operational transactions, material counts, inspection results, dispositions, from your WMS, MES, and ERP through the API, so the quality record reflects what is happening on the floor. Connector breadth is expanding as part of our funded backend roadmap; in a demo we will show you exactly what connects today.
What does it cost?+
Pricing is scoped to your sites, suppliers, and volume rather than published as a flat number, so we set it together. The plans page lays out what each tier unlocks.
Request access

See it run on your suppliers.

A working demo, not slides. Bring a real supplier scenario and we'll walk the operating system end to end, from containment to recovery.

FOR SUPPLIER QUALITY ENGINEERS & THE LEADERS WHO OWN THE METRICS